Aiger Innovations
Perspective

Most companies are running a year behind.

Not because they lack the budget or the licences — because the value moved, and their plans didn’t. Here is where we think it went, and what we do about it.

The work AI can finish alone keeps getting longer.

Every few months, the length of task an AI can complete without a person stepping in roughly doubles. A year ago it drafted the email. Now it assembles the report. Next, it runs the project. Plans written for last year’s ceiling are already out of date.

Where most plans stop
A year agoNext
  1. Draft an email
  2. Summarise a meeting
  3. Prepare a report
  4. Review a hundred contracts
  5. Run a week-long project
The shape of the trend, not a measurement: tasks AI can finish on its own, growing on a doubling curve.

The model is a commodity. The harness isn’t.

Models are converging and increasingly interchangeable. What makes one company’s AI better than another’s is what surrounds the model: the context it’s given, the tools it can use, what it remembers, what it may touch and the checks on its work. Build that well and you can swap the model the day a better one ships.

ContextToolsMemoryPermissionsChecksModel A
The same harness, three models. The work keeps flowing while the model slot changes underneath it.

Price the task, not the token.

A model that is cheaper per token can be more expensive per task — it takes more steps, more retries, more of a person’s time to fix. And for bulk work like sorting or labelling, a small specialised model can do the job for a fraction of a general one. We measure cost per finished task, and pick the model per job.

Per token

Illustrative

Model A

Cheaper

Model B

Per finished task

Model A

Model B

Cheaper

Small model, bulk labelling

Right tool
  • Model calls
  • Retries and extra steps
  • A person fixing the output
Relative cost to finish one task, by where the cost comes from. Shapes only — no prices.

Evals are the product.

Producing an answer is the easy part. Knowing it’s right is the hard one — and it’s what most enterprise AI is missing. We build evaluation suites from your real work, run them before every release and every model change, and check outputs in a fresh context that didn’t write them. The person moves from doing the work to checking it.

Eval suite · supplier renewals

Before release · new model version

Illustrative
  • Renewal summary cites every contract clause
  • Figures match the ERP staging area
  • People data never appears outside People
  • Tone matches last quarter’s board pack
  • Escalation count matches ticketing systemRegression
  • Refuses to send without sign-off

5 of 6 passed

Release held · back to the team

An eval run before a release. A regression is caught and the release is held — before your team ever sees it.

Structure beats scale.

Pouring every document into one index doesn’t make knowledge findable; it makes it noisy. Structure — an ontology, labels, linked records — narrows what the AI has to read to answer a question. Less to read, less to get wrong. It’s also why knowledge-base projects stall: labelling is the hard part, so that’s the part we do.

Against a pile

Reads thousands of chunks. Most are near-misses; some contradict each other.

Against a structure

CustomerContractRenewalTicketProductOwnerSupplier

Reads four records. The path is the answer, and every step is traceable.

The same question against a pile and against a structure. With structure, the AI reads a handful of records instead of thousands.

Decide where people stay.

Not every step needs a person, and not every step can go without one. If it can be undone, let it run. If it can’t — sending to a customer, signing a contract, deleting a record — a person signs off. We draw that line per workflow, with you, instead of leaving it to default.

Customer renewal pack

Illustrative
  1. Read the contracts

    Reversible

  2. Draft recommendations

    Reversible

  3. Check against policy

    Automatic

  4. Share with Legal

    Reversible

  5. Sign the renewal

    Irreversible

    Approved by head of procurement · sent

One workflow, step by step. Reversible steps run on their own; the irreversible one waits for a person.

Four tiers. Most companies stop at the first.

Adoption isn’t one switch. It’s four distinct capabilities — each needs more of the harness than the last.

ContextToolsMemoryPermissionsChecksModel

Needs: Context · Memory

Each tier lights the parts of the harness it needs. Pick a tier.

Find out which year you’re in.

One discovery call. We’ll map where your company sits on each of these — and what closing the gap would take.

Book a discovery call